In memoriam Zygmund Bauman
I just recently heard
that Zygmund Bauman has died. He was
born in 1925 in Poland, was professor of sociology at Leeds University, head
of department. He was interested in many topics. Fascinated me their insights
about modernity. He was perhaps the only sociologist who admired me.
It was the
Vytautas Magnus University in Kaunas where the first time I have meet him, not personally,
but his works. Later, in 2007 the University gave him an honorary doctorate.
One time at the
meeting with journalists he sad “I am
not a prophet”. It would be some misunderstanding to call philosopher a
prophet. Despite this the professor liked to carry away and analyse, and this
thinking’s you can call almost prophetic. He was productive, has written more
than fifty books. He called to look to his ideas as a test. To show possible
consequences of the present processes. The same thing hooked me and I started
to go deeper in my studies. But let’s go back to the professor.
@thinkingoftheworld.wordpress.com
According to Bauman
each of us carries two worlds. It is virtual and non – virtual worlds. Virtual
world taking up a large part of our time, changing us when we are in there. But
the virtual world is simple, does not require a bit of efforts. It is enough to
enter a Google search and get the answer to your question. Then you need to
purchase an item, it is not necessary to go to the store and communicate with
the seller and choose an item live. However, a significant advantage of such
communication matters. Than virtual
world take risk. First - it makes lack
of socialization communication reduces
itself face – to – face contact. Second – the lack of patience. Virtually
everything is achieved very quickly. Modern children has difficulty to
concentrate to read books, because there is nothing moving. I have mentioned
that my self-reading the mostly online news sites. And always was wondering how
articles has transience. Often I get irritated when you find an interesting
article and would like to once again look at. Often, I am getting annoying.
When you find an interesting article, and would like to look at it once again,
suddenly you understand that it has gone. If you have not been prudent and did
not made copy. Events disappears very quickly in au world.
Does professor suggest
any recipes? It is not a philosopher’s business to make recipes, such saying I have
learn in my studies. Computers became part of our life’s. And that make as
proposal Bauman calls it banal thing. Tell the children what they lose, promote
them to communicate with friends, read paper books, play outside, think
independently. Here he applies to Gutenberg’s invention. When printing machine was
invented it also prevailed people in a huge upset. This has led to unexpected
consequences. It has greatly facilitated the spread of the Reformation. As it
is known the Reformations one of the key things has been proclamation of the
gospel in national languages.
And a desperately
needed cheap books. Possibility to get cheaper books makes that they can be
accessible to mainstream audience. The Bible is no longer elitist publication.
Clearly elitism defenders did not want to lose ground.
The forth risk – it is
comfort zone created by the internet. You do not want to exit from it. On the street,
you can meet unpleasant people. In the virtual world, you can meet hem too, but
it is much easier to avoid them. The network allows you to manage the
situation. You may create a network that will depend on you. In the internet is
easy to add friends and discarded them. But real communication takes places not
among those who believe in the same thing as you are, said Bauman. We need
encourage dialogue, for a be tested our ideas and beliefs.
In his theory of
liquid modernity Bauman argues that in the current century all agreements are
temporary and short – lived. For this theory professor was considered as one of
the most important social scientist in the world. More explicated idea is in
the book “The moral blindness: loss of sensation in liquid modernity “. Here he
focusses analysis on increasingly individualistic world and the loss of
community. Democracy finds itself in the crisis because of lost confidence.
When it occurs global challenges, such as migrant crisis, it is necessary to act
and to decide what to do. But cannot do or solve the global problem on the
nation state level. That’s why ES has turbulent in their decisions. Nation
states do not want to accept decision made from Brussel. And national level is
too low for a solve global problem. Power is becoming globalized, but the
policy of nation – states are localized. Many of state rejected to take immigrants.
Or same states were agreeing, but the migrants from there states has escaped.
It has happened so with Baltic states. So, it works only partly.
The tempo is disappointing
to local nations. They want to regain control of borders, to recover the
country for themselves. As it has happened in the case of Great Britain. The
professor believes that the Treaty of Versailles guide these principles. It has
spread the idea at that time, that every nation has the right to self-
government. But today is no longer a homogeneous area and it is outdated idea,
said Bauman.
There is already a
broken connection between the places where you live and your identity.
Traditionally the community members became members from the birth. It is
believed now that you should create their own community.
In 2016 he has given
interview for the Spanish El Pais. There Bauman speaks about freedom and
security. These two values difficult to reconcile. If you want more security must
sacrifice more freedom. If you want more freedom, you must give more security.
Bauman became famous
in 1989 by the book „Modernity and the Holocaust “.
Comments
Post a Comment